Active MRSA screening

In this meta-analysis, researchers attempted to compare different MRSA screening methods (active-rapid by PCR, active-usual by culture, or no active screening), to outcomes (incidence of MRSA acquisition, MRSA blood stream infections, or MRSA surgical site infections). They found PCR versus culture screening did not affect rates of MRSA acquisition, but that PCR versus no screening significantly reduced MRSA blood stream infections. This implies that some screening is better than no screening, but that the type of screening (PCR vs culture) is less important (abstract).

Danielle Scheurer

Dr. Scheurer is a clinical hospitalist and the Medical Director of Quality and Safety at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, South Carolina, and is Assistant Professor of Medicine. She is a graduate of the University of Tennessee College of Medicine, completed her residency at Duke University, and completed her Masters in Clinical Research at the Medical University of South Carolina. She also serves as the Web Editor and Physician Advisor for the Society of Hospital Medicine.

Leave a Comment