End of Life Care

Legacy from the Dying to the Living

by Jamie Yao
By: Jamie Yao Jamie is a fourth year medical student at the University of California, San Francisco entering into the field of internal medicine. She shares how her recent experience on a palliative care rotation at Moffitt Hospital in San Francisco, CA inspired her to express her feelings through poetry. Many of the moments on my palliative care rotation, such as the ones described in the poem, were inspiring. One that particularly resonates is when I had the opportunity to facilitate and witness the video chat exchange between one of our patients and his family, including his young children. It was simultaneously joyful and heartbreaking to see the love shared between him, his fiancee, and children. It was one of the many examples I encountered of the interactions between patients and their loved ones, who were often the crux of what patients derived meaning from in their lives. "Legacy from…
Jamie Yao is a fourth year UCSF medical student entering the field of internal medicine. Prior to medical school, she majored in Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Genetics at UCLA and completed a year of AmeriCorps with Hudson River HealthCare in Peekskill, New York. During her time on a palliative care elective at Moffitt Cancer Center, she had the privilege of working with and learning from an interprofessional team that showed her the varied ways that providers can care for patients. After being incredibly impacted by the patients she met and the vulnerability, resilience and love that they shared with her and their loved ones, she wrote her reflections in the poem, "Legacy from the Dying to the Living."

The Last Days: Cash or Credit?

How often do you hear the following: the average senior utilizes  25% of their lifetime health spend during their last six months of life.  Too much. All that service use in such a concentrated period suggests possibilities. ICUs and inpatient care have great costs.  Our acute and post-acute institutions also do not hold up as models of efficient care delivery.  Most of them at least. What to do? I see the above observations as something akin to an emperor with no clothes. Because leaders with checkbooks have a focus on areas that will generate cost reductions, they seek opportunities they can wrap their arms around.  The more disadvantaged and disjointed ambulatory practices cause too many headaches.  Hospitals then seem like the right place.  Hospitalists and inpatient practitioners seem like the right people. The logic goes, with advanced directives and creative thinking, the right docs and facilities can make a dent…

CMS Just Paid for Advance Care Planning. But You’ll Still Make More Giving Injections.

I know the following may convey a lack of gratitude.  CMS funds a code, and by doing so, validates an activity for so long many in medicine have overlooked or dismissed.  Many specialists probably viewed end of life counseling as "stuff" those docs in the offices without the cherry finished cabinets dealt with.  You know. Trivial stuff.  Well, at least we can put that little contrivance to bed.  Amen. Cash is hard to come by these days and introducing a newly funded service risks cost overruns from overuse.  But if I had to guess how often practitioners will utilize these new E/Ms (99497 and 99498), my bet would be less than expected--and CMS can ease their fears that providers will back their Brink's truck in. (more…)

Hey Hospitalists, Let’s Have a Conversation about “The Conversation”

by Howard Epstein, MD, FHM Last week, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) - the nation’s largest payer of healthcare services and the 800 pound gorilla in setting medical necessity and coverage policies - announced a proposal to begin paying for goals of care and advance care planning (ACP) discussions between medical providers and patients. Sound familiar? It should. This is the same, seemingly no-brainer proposal that in 2009 was stricken from the eventually approved Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA, AKA the ACA, AKA “Obamacare”) in response to the intentional and patently false accusations of government run “death panels” in the hopes of salvaging some measure of bipartisan support. As we all know, the bill eventually passed the following year without a single Republican voting in favor in either the House or Senate – and without funding for ACP sessions! This is not the first attempt…

Yes. I have a problem with mortality rates!

I have always had a bugaboo with mortality rates.  It is a clunky standard. We need death measures to serve as precise tools for quality improvement and hospital performance.  If a hospital has a standardized mortality rate of 3%, you can assume only a small percentage of individuals suffered their fate due to medical error.  People have cancer.  People have end-stage organ failure. People die in hospitals.  It's a fact of life, and we cannot prevent the inevitable.  Can a metric give us the nuance we require then? Don't think of the SMR as a collective sum of how a hospital performs; see it as something similar to what I illustrate in the death table below: (more…)