Rounds: Are We Spinning our Wheels?

>
By  |  November 21, 2017 | 

As a Johns Hopkins undergraduate, I used to run the Welch lecture series in medical history. Through this role, I learned about an interesting tidbit – the origin of the word “rounds.” Johns Hopkins Hospital had a circular ward where the infamous and quotable Dr. Osler made his “rounds” to see patients.

While medicine has come a long way since Osler’s days, have rounds? This is the crux of a paper in the Journal of Hospital Medicine by led one of our former Pritzker students Olliver Hulland along with mentors and hospitalists Dr. Jeanne Farnan and Dr. Barrett Fromme. In a 3-site study with UCSF and Georgetown, they conducted focus groups with attendings and medical students to ask the quintessential question, “What is the purpose of rounds?” Interestingly, the answers were markedly similar and revealed the multi-faceted nature of rounds:

  • Communication, which included coordination of patient care team, patient/family communication, establishing rapport with patients and/or family, and establishment of roles.
  • Medical education, including clinical education, exposure to clinical decision making, role modeling, student presentations, establishment of trainee autonomy, and providing a safe learning environment.
  • Assessment, which included both attending observation, assessment, and feedback and establishment of expectations.
  • Patient care, which included both formation of the patient care plan and delivery of patient care.

Perhaps the most important question posed in the study was “What do you believe the ideal purpose of rounds should be?” While there was general agreement on medical education, the most interesting finding was that all pediatric attendings emphasized family-centered rounds and patient/family communication while only 23% of internal medicine attendings did. I knew pediatrics emphasized family-centered rounds, but could internal medicine be that far behind? If so, why? I cannot help but wonder what patients would think of this study and in particular what their perspective on rounds are? It also reminds me of a prior study in the Journal of Hospital Medicine that described how Dr. Monash (also co-author on the current rounds study) and colleagues went to great length to make rounds more patient-centered, except the learners did not like them as much. So is there a happy medium? And if so, where and how do we get there? These are just a few of the questions that I had, and I am sure you may have others or want to share your perspective on what the purpose of rounds should be.

Unlike rounds, which “can be time consuming, complex, and vary in quality” according to the paper, #JHMChat is always one hour, simple to participate in, and very engaging according to this moderator. We welcome you to join us for #JHMChat on Monday, November 27th at 9pm ET.

In the interim, have a happy Thanksgiving holiday and for those of you on-service, happy rounding.

Share This Post

Leave A Comment

For security, use of Google's reCAPTCHA service is required which is subject to the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

About the Author: Vineet Arora

Vineet Arora, MD, MAPP, MHM is Associate Chief Medical Officer, Clinical Learning Environment at University of Chicago Medicine and Assistant Dean for Scholarship and Discovery at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine. Dr. Arora’s scholarly work has focused on resident duty hours, patient handoffs, sleep, and quality and safety of hospital care. She is the recipient of the SHM Excellence in Hospital Medicine Research Award in 2007. Her work has appeared in numerous journals, including JAMA and the Annals of Internal Medicine, and has received coverage from the New York Times, CNN, and US News & World Report. She was selected as ACP Hospitalist Magazine’s Top Hospitalist in 2009 and by HealthLeaders Magazine as one of 20 who make healthcare better in 2011. She has testified to the Institute of Medicine on resident duty hours and to Congress about increasing medical student debt and the primary care crisis. As an academic hospitalist, she supervises medical residents and students caring for hospitalized patients. Dr. Arora is an avid social media user, and serves as Deputy Social Media Editor to the Journal of Hospital Medicine, helping to maintain its Twitter feed and Facebook presence. She blogs about her experiences at http://www.FutureDocsblog.com and actively tweets at @futuredocs.

Categories

Related Posts

By Michelle Brooks, MD
May 26, 2022 |  0
Preparing to go on parental leave? For most of us, planning involved casual conversations with colleagues who had recently entered parenthood and learning from their experiences. Some more proactive parents-to-be may have specifically met with their leadership to formulate plans for coverage for clinical, research, and other administrative work. But this isn’t the norm in […]
By Michelle Brooks, MD
January 31, 2022 |  0
Despite the scheduling snafu during the College Football Championship, so many rock star hospitalists, medical students, residents, and guests helped make the first #JHMChat of 2022 incredible! Whether you were lurking (ahem, we see you, Dr. Lauren Mazzurco) or a top tweeter (most of you averaged 9 tweets/person!), it was great to “see” so many […]
By Lanna Felde, MD
November 22, 2021 |  2
Last week’s #JHMChat saw an all-star guest lineup including Drs. Adam Rodman, Zahir Kanjee, Laura McNamara, and Shane Warnock of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center debating the value of the routine daily physical exam – is it worthwhile or a waste of time? This question was recently debated in our Point: Counterpoint series and got […]
Go to Top