So where do we lead? What direction should we be taking our groups?

By  |  October 15, 2009 | 

Rob Chang writes…

Most of my colleagues on this leadership blog have been involved with leadership on the national level, whether via the Society of Hospital Medicine or through leadership of a multi-state hospitalist organization.  I have not.  I am a local hospitalist leader in an academic center, dealing with the daily mundane tasks of our group’s administration (I do make schedules with my secretary), the future concerns and opportunities for our group (what’s the next big thing we are facing), and contributing to our group’s identity as an academic success (publishing on the things that we do every day as hospitalists).

My world consists of Ann Arbor, a remarkably blue city in a sea of red, a beautiful mix of great restaurants, college-city entertainment and lots of green space, trees and fields.  I have a new house I’m struggling to fill with furniture, one piece at a time (much less one room at a time).  I wake up to work with a fantastic group of physicians who I can rely upon and trust; to a hospital that is flawed, generous, self-important and yet seeking to improve itself; and to a job that emphasizes improving the workplace for our physicians and patients, teaching residents and transforming what we do into something that can be passed along to others.  Perhaps that sounds familiar?

For me, the national stage is one I can turn my back on without trouble.  I am terribly glad that we have people who are willing and interested in performing on that level…and I am highly invested in making sure that those are the right people.

But that does not mean I do not lead.  And in all likelihood, if you are reading this blog, you will also not operate on the national level.
But that also does not mean that you do not lead.

So where do we lead?  What direction should we be taking our groups?

I was reading through some of the posts in recent months and I’ll start with one core goal: investment in the hospital that you work in, as in this post by John Nelson.  This type of investment does reduce burnout by hospitalists but I think it does so by allowing physicians to help shape how their workplace looks.  While that benefits the hospitalists, I believe we bring something to the table that many academic (and non-academic) hospitals have often lacked – a strong, persistent physician voice that highlights issues that are often overlooked or dropped due to insufficient time or avenues of improvement.

More on local leadership next time.

About the Author:


Related Posts

By  | April 23, 2018 |  0
“You can teach a canary in a coal mine to meditate, but it is still going to die.” I have seen this canary sentiment as a metaphor for health care and burnout pop up a few times on Twitter recently, attributed to a couple different thoughtful doctors, including Dr. Jenny Ramsey (at Hospital Medicine 2018), […]
By  | April 10, 2018 |  0
If you are in the business of healthcare – whether as a direct care provider who is doing their best in an increasingly complex system with an increasingly complex panel of patients, a hospital medicine group leader who is trying to keep a group afloat and lead people through this rocky terrain or a hospital […]
By  | April 3, 2018 |  0
I’m so excited that it’s (finally!) almost time for SHM’s annual conference! Last year I missed HM17 – for the first time in a dozen years – due to a death in the family, so I’ve been experiencing “annual conference withdrawal syndrome” for a long time now. There’s no cure for that, other than a […]

One Comment

  1. Jairy Hunter November 5, 2009 at 10:29 am - Reply

    This is an excellent point, Robert. I think with the meteoric rise of hospitalists into the administrative realm, we local leaders grapple with the question of “what’s next?” We feel the urgency sometimes to move on to “bigger and better things,” when we have a monumental task(s) right in front of us. I guess for some of us, making an impact on a smaller scale is gratification enough.

Leave A Comment