In this single institution before-after study, survival did not improve after the switch from standard monophasic external defibrillators to biphasic AED’s. Time to first shock was no different between the 2 groups, nor was survival to discharge in those with Vtach or Vfib. Those with asystole or PEA actually had lower survival after initiation of AED’s (15% survival for AED’s versus 23% survival for standard defibrillators). This suggests that, in settings where rhythms are likely to be unresponsive to defibrillation (such as in-hospital setting), AED’s are unlikely to improve survival above that offered by standard external defibrillators (abstract).
Share This Post
Categories
Related Posts
While spring 2020 feels like a lifetime ago, COVID-19 is still with us. Unfortunately, this winter has brought more infections, hospitalizations, and death rates that eclipse what many saw last spring. But this time, while the headlines are back about hospitals running low on PPE, ICU bed shortages, and long lines for testing, we now […]
This article is part of a series in The Hospital Leader written by members of the Division of Hospital Medicine at Dell Medical School at The University of Texas in Austin, exploring lessons learned from the coronavirus pandemic and outlining an approach for creating COVID-19 Centers of Excellence. Evidence on emerging treatments for COVID-19 has […]
While all of us see patients who smoke in their 70s or 80s, due to their limited lifespan from COPD, DM, malignancy, etc., and their expressed wishes to continue tobacco, we keep our admonitions to a minimum. We accept our patient has become learned enough through life to make their own decisions and accept whatever […]
Leave A Comment