Look At How Safe [Fill in the Blank] Is!

By  |  October 14, 2007 | 

The rate of fatal domestic airline crashes has fallen by 65% in the past decade – from an amazingly low rate of one fatal accident in about 2 million departures in 1997, to a breathtakingly low rate of one in 4.5 million departures this year. Flying just keeps getting safer and safer.

Beginning with the 1999 Institute of Medicine report on medical errors, aviation has become the poster child for patient safety. In fact, it was an aviation analogy – the translation of the 44,000-98,000 deaths per year from medical errors into “the equivalent of a jumbo jet a day crashing” – that jumpstarted the patient safety field in the first place.

On the whole, I like the aviation analogy, because it energizes us and helps illustrate the need for certain safety-oriented practices, such as standardization, simplification, simulation, teamwork training, and effective reporting systems and regulations. It is also uniquely accessible: who would ever fly electively if a big plane went down every day in the U.S.? Yet hundreds of thousands of people check into hospitals and clinics electively daily.

But lately, I’ve sensed gathering pushback against the aviation analogy – as well as against analogies from other industries. “This has nothing to do with us,” I hear from colleagues sometimes. “Healthcare is so different.” And they’re partly right. For example, we have learned that dampening down authority gradients on a med-surg ward is orders of magnitude harder than doing so in a cockpit. Here’s why: to prevent another Tenerife disaster (the horrific 1977 runway incursion/collision of two 747s, ostensibly caused when the flight engineer – who suspected there was a large airplane blocking the way – felt uncomfortable speaking up to his boss, the pilot), aviation had to transform its culture.

Without minimizing the heavy lifting involved, the trick in aviation was getting two people – with similar training, expertise, social status, income, language and, usually, gender, each working inside a hermetically sealed cockpit – to feel comfortable raising concerns. Contrast this to a hospital ward, OR, or ICU, where the challenge may be to persuade a high school educated clerk to speak up to the chief of neurosurgery when she suspects (but isn’t sure) that something is wrong. This is a fundamentally different can of worms.

I continue to find analogies from other industries useful, but we must recognize their limitations. Simple solutions that worked so well in the [fill in the blank] industry often fail in healthcare because our workplace is like a dozen industries rolled into one. For example, a busy hospital and its workers may face these challenges:

  • How to move a part (like a pathology specimen) seamlessly down an assembly line, just like Toyota does.
  • How to get an important piece of data (like a discharge summary) from place to place, just like FedEx does.
  • How to make difficult, weighty decisions (like whether to do open up an abdomen) under conditions of overwhelming uncertainty, just like a field general or a business CEO does.
  • How to deal with major and only partly predictable changes in capacity needs (like when the “bus shows up” at 7 pm in the Emergency Department), like McDonalds does at lunchtime.
  • How to providing “expectation-surpassing” customer service (so that we ace our Press-Ganey survey), just like the Ritz Carlton or Nordstrom does.
  • How to innovate, both with processes and technologies (a consuming interest in an academic medical center like mine), just like Apple does.
  • How to teach wildly disparate learners (like the ones on my team when I’m ward attending), just like a high school teacher does (or would do, if her class included freshman, sophomores, juniors and seniors).

Think about it for a second. Can you conjure up another industry that confronts more than two or three of these challenges? I can’t. And not only are all these conditions present simultaneously in most healthcare organizations, there are times when a single doctor or nurse confronts all of them!

This complexity means that fixes drawn from other industries, as important as they are, can’t just be airlifted (no pun) into healthcare without substantial modification. They’ll inevitably fail. Yet there are graveyards filled with business leaders who stormed into the world of medicine, declared “I know how to fix you – just look at how I fixed XYZ industry!” – and left a couple of years later, shaking their head in bewilderment.

So let’s keep looking outside healthcare for solutions to our safety (and quality and efficiency and service) problems. But let’s also be prepared for the hard work of translating these insights into fixes that will work in our peculiar world.

One Comment

  1. Robert in Portland October 25, 2007 at 3:16 pm - Reply

    While I’ve been guilty of using the aviation analogy myself, I’ve always thought it didn’t truly fit. It took a medical student’s observation during teaching rounds to remind me of at least one reason why. “When the plane crashes, the pilots go down with the rest, that makes their committment ot safety a bit more personal.”

Leave A Comment

About the Author:

Robert M. Wachter, MD is Professor and Interim Chairman of the Department of Medicine at the University of California, San Francisco, where he holds the Lynne and Marc Benioff Endowed Chair in Hospital Medicine. He is also Chief of the Division of Hospital Medicine. He has published 250 articles and 6 books in the fields of quality, safety, and health policy. He coined the term hospitalist” in a 1996 New England Journal of Medicine article and is past-president of the Society of Hospital Medicine. He is generally considered the academic leader of the hospitalist movement, the fastest growing specialty in the history of modern medicine. He is also a national leader in the fields of patient safety and healthcare quality. He is editor of AHRQ WebM&M, a case-based patient safety journal on the Web, and AHRQ Patient Safety Network, the leading federal patient safety portal. Together, the sites receive nearly one million unique visits each year. He received one of the 2004 John M. Eisenberg Awards, the nation’s top honor in patient safety and quality. He has been selected as one of the 50 most influential physician-executives in the U.S. by Modern Healthcare magazine for the past eight years, the only academic physician to achieve this distinction; in 2015 he was #1 on the list. He is a former chair of the American Board of Internal Medicine, and has served on the healthcare advisory boards of several companies, including Google. His 2015 book, The Digital Doctor: Hope, Hype, and Harm at the Dawn of Medicine’s Computer Age, was a New York Times science bestseller.


Related Posts

By  | June 26, 2018 |  2
JAMA just published the largest trial I have seen on a Hospital at Home (HAH) model to date and the first one out in the last few years. It comes from Mount Sinai in NYC–who have led the pack in this style of care if national presentations are the judge. They launched the program three […]
By  | March 7, 2018 |  0
I am angry. Perhaps, you are too. As a physician, it is heart-wrenching to watch people unnecessarily die from gun violence. As a mom, it strikes fear in my heart to know that our nation’s children are not safe in our schools. I vividly remember being a resident on call in the ICU when I […]
By  | February 28, 2018 |  0
“We are playing the same sport, but a different game,” the wise, thoughtful emergency medicine attending physician once told me. “I am playing speed chess – I need to make a move quickly, or I lose – no matter what. My moves have to be right, but they don’t always necessarily need to be the […]