Hospitalists and compensation incentives based on quality – what do we know?

By  |  July 2, 2009 | 

John Nelson writes…

Since SHM has began gathering data in 1997, the majority of hospitalists have shifted from a fixed, or “straight,” compensation, to a compensation method that includes a variable component based on performance.  Productivity, as measured in things like RVUs or encounters, is the most common variable element, but quality metrics used as a basis for a portion of compensation are rapidly gaining in popularity.

In late 2008, SHM’s Practice Analysis Committee conducted a survey focused on hospitalist turnover and participation in quality initiativesOf the 115 groups responding, 96% indicated that their group participates in quality initiatives at their hospital, most commonly serving on quality-related committees at the hospital.  You probably want to make sure that your group isn’t in the 4% that don’t work on quality initiatives.

A more remarkable fact from the survey is that “97% of respondents also indicated at least one individual in the group has a formally designated quality role within the hospital or health system (such as Chief Quality Officer, Patient Safety Officer, Medical Director for Case Management, etc.); 86% of such positions involve dedicated time and pay for this work.”

More than half of groups responding to the survey (58%) reported that a portion of hospitalist compensation is based on performance on quality initiatives.  Of these, 97% had less than 20% of annual compensation connected to quality, and nearly half (43%) had <7% of annual pay connected to quality.

Remarkably, 64% of groups responding indicated that the quality-related compensation was paid based on individual, rather than group, performance.  That is, within the same group one hospitalist might be compensated for a high score on a quality metric while someone else in the same group might be paid less for a lower score on the same metric.  This is surprising because so many quality metrics, like core measures and patient satisfaction, are difficult to connect to a single hospitalist’s performance.

Leave A Comment

About the Author:


Related Posts

By  | June 13, 2018 |  0
In 2011-2012, an undergrad pre-med student performed an ingeniously simple but enlightening health policy study. Jamie Rosenthal called 122 hospitals across the U.S. (2 randomly selected hospitals from each state, plus Washington D.C., along with the 20 top-ranked orthopedic hospitals according to the US News and World Report rankings that year) and asked them what […]
By  | June 7, 2018 |  0
Everywhere I go these days, one of the top questions on the minds of hospital leaders and hospitalists alike is, “How can we improve hospitalist patient satisfaction scores?” It’s a dilemma. There are people who know way more about this subject than me, but I’m not aware of anyone who has really cracked the nut. […]
By  | May 14, 2018 |  0
Harper’s Magazine dates back to 1850, and their monthly list of statistics started in 1984. After attending SHM’s annual conference last month, I thought I’d present a few of my favorite pearls similar to the Harper’s Index each month in their magazine. % of Medicare patients discharged with an opiate prescription: 14% % of those […]