Why We Lie

By  |  May 30, 2012 | 

I particularly enjoyed this article from the WSJ last weekend.  It is a piece you finish and satisfactorily conclude your time was not wasted.  You have gained a new perspective in reexamining a deed, in this case lying, that we all engage in periodically—that we rationalize, trivialize, or justify—for unwelcome reasons we sidestep to achieve our selfish ends.  This opening paragraph got me hooked:

Not too long ago, one of my students, named Peter, told me a story that captures rather nicely our society’s misguided efforts to deal with dishonesty. One day, Peter locked himself out of his house. After a spell, the locksmith pulled up in his truck and picked the lock in about a minute.

“I was amazed at how quickly and easily this guy was able to open the door,” Peter said. The locksmith told him that locks are on doors only to keep honest people honest. One percent of people will always be honest and never steal. Another 1% will always be dishonest and always try to pick your lock and steal your television; locks won’t do much to protect you from the hardened thieves, who can get into your house if they really want to. The purpose of locks, the locksmith said, is to protect you from the 98% of mostly honest people who might be tempted to try your door if it had no lock.

The piece deserves a full read, but before I relate this article to physician behavior, which got me thinking in the first place, have a look at the graphic that encapsulates the author’s findings (click to enlarge):

It is not about the money, nor the fear of reprimand, but a host of other factors–surprisingly more potent than financial rewards.  Interesting, huh?

On to the profession of the healing arts…

Another quote came to mind as I read the piece.  It is stinging and harsh.  I have no source, and recall it by memory only because of those latter qualities.  Nevertheless, its context will not require much imagination.  The quote relates to physicians, and the lies they convey to insurance companies to obtain pre-certification for patient testing perceived as necessary:

On Ethics of patient disclosure: any physicians consider lying to a health plan to be a sin on par with the sin of lying to the SS when they knock on the door to ask if you are hiding a family of Jews in the attic.

Ruthless yes, but the comparable root causes that motivate doctors to lie to insurance companies, surface in the article and are stark.  It is a helpful reminder as to why we do it, and perhaps why we should stop.  It is the insight and looking in the mirror thing.

In addition, it is not just insurance companies we deceive, but patients.  Again, we succumb.

The literature is replete with studies like these (search in PubMed–industry COI, error disclosure, etc.), with our elementary features laid bare for all to glimpse.  We are humble folk and have the same foibles as the flock we oversee.

I did take solace in this widely viewed poll though, knowing we have preserved our standing, over time, warts and all:

At least we can console ourselves that we best our elected officials.  As John McCain likes to say on Congress and his colleagues’ plight, “we are down to paid staffers and blood relatives.”

*BONUS*: From the United Hospital Fund: Here.  A nice Q&A explanation for families describing the role of the hospitalist in the care of their relative.

One Comment

  1. […] 5/30/12 on The Hospitalist […]

Leave A Comment

About the Author:

Brad Flansbaum
Bradley Flansbaum, DO, MPH, MHM works for Geisinger Health System in Danville, PA in both the divisions of hospital medicine and population health. He began working as a hospitalist in 1996, at the inception of the hospital medicine movement. He is a founding member of the Society of Hospital Medicine and served as a board member and officer. He speaks nationally in promoting hospital medicine and has presented at many statewide meetings and conferences. He is also actively involved in house staff education. Currently, he serves on the SHM Public Policy Committee and has an interest in payment policy, healthcare market competition, health disparities, cost-effectiveness analysis, and pain and palliative care. He is SHM’s delegate for the AMA House of Delegates. Dr. Flansbaum received his undergraduate degree from Union College in Schenectady, NY and attended medical school at the New York College of Osteopathic Medicine. He completed his residency and chief residency in Internal Medicine at Long Island Jewish Medical Center in New York. He received his M.P.H. in Health Policy and Management at Columbia University. He is a political junky, and loves to cook, stay fit, read non-fiction, listen to many genres of music, and is a resident of Danville, PA.


Related Posts

By  | July 11, 2018 |  2
In my previous post, I discussed the challenges associated with measuring hospitalists’ patient satisfaction scores. I noted that CMS never designed the HCAHPS survey to evaluate the performance of individual providers or groups; it is only valid for assessing hospital-level performance related to patients’ experience of care. I also reviewed some structural impediments that likely […]
By  | June 7, 2018 |  0
Everywhere I go these days, one of the top questions on the minds of hospital leaders and hospitalists alike is, “How can we improve hospitalist patient satisfaction scores?” It’s a dilemma. There are people who know way more about this subject than me, but I’m not aware of anyone who has really cracked the nut. […]
By  | June 4, 2018 |  3
The question of appropriate ward garb is a problem for the ages. Compared to photo stills and films from the 1960s, the doctors of today appear like vagabonds. No ties, no lab coats, and scrub tops have become the norm for a number (a majority ?) of hospital-based docs—and even more so on the surgical […]