Saturdays, Sundays, and Mortality Risk. Again.

By  |  September 7, 2015 | 

If you wish to avert your eyes and palate to the customs of the Brits, fine.  Don’t eat fries with vinegar. However, as comparisons go to UK healthcare, you will serve yourself well by absorbing some if not many lessons the NHS has to offer.  Hospitals may differ country to country. Regardless, lower weekend staffing ratios and the proclivity of the sickest folks to wait until the last minute to present to the emergency room, often on Saturday or Sunday, do not differ.  Most acute care facilities do not operate at full staff 24/7.  Most people hate hospitals.  Among many commonalities, Americans and British share as much in those attributes.

With that in mind, the BMJ just released a reexamination of NHS 2009-10 data comparing hospital mortality rates on patients admitted on weekdays versus weekends.  The 2013-14 treatment, with greater refinement in methods, replicates earlier findings. Freemantle and colleagues find an increased risk of death of 10% for admissions on a Saturday and 15% for admissions on a Sunday compared with patients admitted on a Wednesday.  They adjusted for case mix, age, time of year, trust, deprivation, number of previous emergency admissions, number of previous complex admissions, admission source, admission urgency, sex, ethnicity, and Charlson Comorbidity Index:




However, patients already in the hospital over the weekend do not have an increased risk of death. One can speculate as to the disparity.  An established (and more stable) patient probably incurs less risk of fewer (unrehearsed) staff performing “stuff” on them, in addition to having more limited needs.




The authors sum it up:

Our analysis of 2013-14 data suggests that around 11,000 more people die each year within 30 days of admission to hospital on Friday, Saturday, Sunday, or Monday compared with other days of the week (Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday). It is not possible to ascertain the extent to which these excess deaths may be preventable; to assume that they are avoidable would be rash and misleading. From an epidemiological perspective, however, this statistic is “not otherwise ignorable” as a source of information on risk of death and it raises challenging questions about reduced service provision at weekends.

While some conflict exists in the literature as to the weekend effect–likely stemming from study design, hospital characteristics, or patient service, the contrast seems too stark, and on its face, too valid and consistent to be overlooked.

In addition to ascertaining root causes, some clear, some not (and perhaps it is here where we have the greatest leverage), the remedy in great part will be more dollars to pay for staffing an already overtaxed system cannot spare.  What else is new.

Two commentaries accompany the study, here and here.


  1. Rupesh Prasad September 9, 2015 at 5:24 pm - Reply

    Hi Brad,

    This seems to be an interesting study with data revealing differences in mortality rates during the course of the week. The reasons I think are open to speculation, and would require further analysis. I think it would be worthwhile to compare with similar data here in the US.

    Some of the factors that could influence patient outcomes include staffing changes over weekends and limited availability of specialists. Further analysis to assess if the use of EHR based measures could positively influence the outcomes would be helpful for planning and improving patient care.


  2. Raman Palabindala September 11, 2015 at 7:06 pm - Reply

    Did they comment on what months during the year pose high risk for death?

Leave A Comment

About the Author: Brad Flansbaum

Brad Flansbaum
Bradley Flansbaum, DO, MPH, MHM works for Geisinger Health System in Danville, PA in both the divisions of hospital medicine and population health. He began working as a hospitalist in 1996, at the inception of the hospital medicine movement. He is a founding member of the Society of Hospital Medicine and served as a board member and officer. He speaks nationally in promoting hospital medicine and has presented at many statewide meetings and conferences. He is also actively involved in house staff education. Currently, he serves on the SHM Public Policy Committee and has an interest in payment policy, healthcare market competition, health disparities, cost-effectiveness analysis, and pain and palliative care. He is SHM’s delegate for the AMA House of Delegates. Dr. Flansbaum received his undergraduate degree from Union College in Schenectady, NY and attended medical school at the New York College of Osteopathic Medicine. He completed his residency and chief residency in Internal Medicine at Long Island Jewish Medical Center in New York. He received his M.P.H. in Health Policy and Management at Columbia University. He is a political junky, and loves to cook, stay fit, read non-fiction, listen to many genres of music, and is a resident of Danville, PA.


Related Posts

By  | September 17, 2018 |  0
Last October, I wrote about the process some healthcare organizations are engaging in to develop written compacts between physicians and the hospitals where they practice. The point of my post was that there are inevitably some generally accepted (but rarely articulated) expectations that the two parties have of each other, and it can be valuable to […]
By  | September 10, 2018 |  1
I am going to teach you something you do not know. I am almost sure of it. Warm handoffs–a term you often hear within the confines of hospital walls when transferring a patient service to service or ward to ward. You do it in-house, but its unlikely you make the same connection when you discharge […]
By  | July 19, 2018 |  5
So out in the varied land of hospital medicine, I have noticed something that I have no clear explanation for. It turns out there is often a gap in productivity between that of NP/PA providers and physicians. The range of the gap varies wildly – I just got off the phone with a HM group […]